Friday, 7 January 2011

Eminent Vatican theologian provides useful perspective on AIDS and condoms

Mgr Michael Schooyans is a philosopher and theologian, a member of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences and the Pontifical Academy for Life, and a Consultant of the Pontifical Council for the Family. In a 2005 paper entitled "AIDS and condoms", he set out to address the moral argument in statements made by prominent individuals from the academic and/or ecclesiastical world who attack the church and demand it change its position on the teachings on condoms and AIDS. In the light of the recent attacks upon the Catholic Church's perennial prohibition of all condom use, readers might find Mgr Schooyans' paper useful.


Comments on this blog? Email them to johnsmeaton@spuc.org.uk
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy

Thursday, 6 January 2011

There is a paradox in society's attitude to infertility and child destruction

Wesley Smith (pictured right) has picked up on an interesting article by Ross Douthat of the New York Times called The Unborn Paradox. Douthat explores the tragedy of human life being readily discarded through abortion, but Smith rightly extends the discussion to account for those lives destroyed in IVF procedures. However, at the same time there remains a desperate longing for human life in society. Douthat insightfully comments that:
In every era, there’s been a tragic contrast between the burden of unwanted pregnancies and the burden of infertility. But this gap used to be bridged by adoption far more frequently than it is today. Prior to 1973, 20 percent of births to white, unmarried women (and 9 percent of unwed births over all) led to an adoption. Today, just 1 percent of babies born to unwed mothers are adopted, and would-be adoptive parents face a waiting list that has lengthened beyond reason.
It is natural for human beings to long to raise children. However, there's an important distinction to be made between the exercising of that longing through applying for adoption and between undergoing IVF treatment. IVF procedures lead to the destruction of innocent human life. 2,137,924 human embryos were created by specialists while assisting couples in the UK to have babies between 1991 and 2005, according to BioNews. During this period, the HFEA informs us that the total of live babies born through IVF procedures was 109,469. IVF treatment disregards the worth of numerous lives while desperately seeking babies for couples unable to conceive. The disregard for life inherent to IVF procedures was made all the more evident last year when it was reported that many women choose to abort their children after conceiving through IVF.

I have said before that amidst all the challenges faced by the pro-life movement, we must continue to work openly and courageously for a ban on all IVF procedures. Opposing in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) does not imply denying babies, conceived by IVF, their humanity. However, it's vital to oppose IVF as a way of conceiving children since it turns human beings into commodities to be brought to birth or discarded at will.

Douthat offers a powerful perspective into the plight of unborn children today. He says:
"This is the paradox of America’s unborn. No life is so desperately sought after, so hungrily desired, so carefully nurtured. And yet no life is so legally unprotected, and so frequently destroyed."
We must continue to work for a society where all human life is respected and legally protected.

Comments on this blog? Email them to johnsmeaton@spuc.org.uk
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

Abortion follows in the wake of contraception

There have been two important stories in recent days linking abortion and contraception. Firstly, a study of women in Spain has found that abortion rates and contraception rates rose in parallel between 1997 and 2007. Secondly, among a large number of British women whose contraceptive implants failed, some went on to have abortions. Both stories need to be examined closely regarding the data used and the individual circumstances involved, but both stories provide evidence of the close association between contraception and abortion. The provision of contraception not only fails to prevent unplanned pregnancies but results in unborn children being victimised to death as the unwelcome consequences of so-called contraceptive failure.

Comments on this blog? Email them to johnsmeaton@spuc.org.uk
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

UK government should not be spending tax-payers' money on aborting the babies of poor people in the developing world

SPUC has responded to the recent announcement by the Department for International Development (DFID) that plans to spend an extra £2.1 billion on programmes including abortion and contraception. It is reported that adolescent girls in poor countries will be a target for UK interventions.

Peter Smith, SPUC’s specialist in international affairs, told the media today:
"It is farcical for the government to talk about safe abortions in situations without sterile surgical facilities, safe blood transfusion or emergency back-up. Running abortion clinics in slums, shanty towns and the bush will harm or kill women as well as killing babies.

"Among the abortion organisations that the UK government currently funds, one runs 30 clinics in South Africa, with 10 so-called mini-clinics in poor townships. The organisation says they are cheap to run, relying on pre-fab buildings, basic equipment and minimal levels of staffing. Since this group started working in South Africa, the maternal death rate, according to the UN, has increased over four-fold. If this kind of intervention is multiplied, the deaths of unborn children and maternal deaths can be expected to increase, not decrease.

“And what is the UK doing bankrolling illegal child sex around the world by promoting contraception for minors? We should learn the lesson of the disastrous government-funded attempts to reduce teenage abortions in the UK, which have focused on providing contraception. There has been a 13% increase in abortions among under 18s in the past 10 years, and a spiralling incidence of sexually-transmitted infections".
Comments on this blog? Email them to johnsmeaton@spuc.org.uk
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy

Sunday, 2 January 2011

There is an amazing flourishing of pro-life work in Belarus

I am very happy to report that there is a flourishing pro-life movement in the former Soviet republic of Belarus. Vladislav Volohovich, a leading pro-life activist in Belarus, has kindly sent me the latest newsletter of the Open Hearts Foundation. Among other things the newsletter explains:
"During the long years of Soviet power we were instilled [with] a strange fear of pregnancy and childbirth, so women and men today simply do not know what to do with children, and do not want for themselves this "burden", and selfishness more and more captures young people. Fear of childbirth, negative attitude[s] of medical staff and many other [things] stop modern moms and dads [from child-bearing]."
The newsletter also details pro-life activity in Belarus' main cities: conferences, vigils, pilgrimages. Both the Orthodox Church, Belarus' majority denomination, and the Catholic Church are active in pro-life activity. So congratulations to Belarus' pro-lifers for starting to turn the historical and contemporary tide, and giving us in the West a great example.

Comments on this blog? Email them to johnsmeaton@spuc.org.uk
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy

Saturday, 1 January 2011

The bishops' domestic abuse website must remove links to anti-life and anti-family groups

The Department for Christian Responsbility and Citizenship of the Catholic bishops' conference of England and Wales has launched an initiative called CEDAR (Catholics Experiencing Domestic Abuse Resources). The bishops' conference is to be congratulated on taking the issue of domestic abuse seriously, not least because women often experience abuse in the home if they refuse to have an abortion. This good work, however, is undone by CEDAR's recommendation of helplines and support services run by anti-life and anti-family organisations. I list some of those organisations below and the ethical problems attached to them. I do not seek to make sweeping condemnations of charities which do many laudable things, but merely to warn that CEDAR's recommendations could very well result to vulnerable Catholics being led not to safety but into the culture of death. Readers may wish to join me in writing to CEDAR to express our concerns about its work:
enquiries@cedar.uk.net
Department for Christian Responsibility and Citizenship
Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales
39 Eccleston Square, London, SW1V 1BX

Ethical problems with helplines and support services recommended by CEDAR (Catholics Experiencing Domestic Abuse Resources):

Action of Elder Abuse and Respond
Members of the Making Decisions Alliance, which campaigned for the pro-euthanasia Mental Capacity Act

Childline
Describes abortion as a legitimate choice; recommends the pro-abortion organisations Brook and the Family Planning Association (FPA) as "sources of help"; says that teenagers "should always use contraception"; and presents homosexuality* as normal.

NSPCC
In 2002 NSPCC launched a pro-abortion website with the cooperation of the pro-abortion organisation Brook. The website currently redirects to Childline (see above). In 2006 NSPCC said in a submission to a government department:  "Children and young people in school need access to sources of advice, support and counselling, which are independent of their families and the school teaching staff ... [S]uch a service can thus...offer information about where to obtain information on contraception, abortion or sexually transmitted infections."

Rights of Women
A strongly pro-abortion organisation. For example, one of its newsletters reads:
"In addition to the legal restrictions, women face serious obstacles in accessing abortions services: anti-choice GPs delaying or refusing to refer women as well as insufficient NHS provision and long waiting times (up to eight weeks in some areas) mean that access to abortion is not guaranteed and can be difficult ... [Laurence] Robertson’s [Prohibition of Abortion (England and Wales)] Bill serves to highlight how extreme the minority anti-abortion lobby is and how little concern they have for women’s health and lives. It is also a chilling reminder that women’s abortion rights remain under constant threat."
Samaritans
SPUC's charities bulletin details how Samaritans has presented abortion and suicide as free choices.

Scottish Women's Aid
Recommends as "useful organisations" Amnesty International, Engender and the UN Division for the Advancement of Women which all lobby for abortion.

Supportline
Its "Sexuality" webpage says: "It is ok to be gay, lesbian, bisexual - whatever feels right for you to be ... [S]ome people have grown up with very fixed ideas, they also may have fixed religious beliefs which can get in the way of acceptance and understanding...". The webpage also recommends a range of homosexualist organisations, including the dissenting Catholic organisation Quest; Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement (its Roman Catholic Caucus helps organise the pro-homosexuality Soho Masses); and other groups which campaign actively against Catholic teaching on sexual ethicsx
Its "Terminal Illness" webpage recommends the Voluntary Euthanasia Society (now trading under the euphemism Dignity in Dying) and a website run by EXIT, a Scottish pro-euthanasia group.
Its "Children and young people" webpage recommends the pro-abortion organisations Brook and Connexions, and pro-abortion website run by Marie Stopes International and the NHS.

Survive
It's "Advice" webpage says: "The most obvious worry is pregnancy. If there is a chance that you may become pregnant after being raped you will be able to get the "morning after" pill to prevent this."
Its list of "useful addresses" includes Brook and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), one of the UK's main abortion providers.

"Wales Domestic Abuse run by Welsh Women's Aid
Under "Children and Young People" it recommends the National Children's Bureau, a pro-abortion organisation which runs the Sex Education Forum. This same page recommends TheSite.org which has a plethora of anti-life/anti-family material, inter alia:

*The late Pope John Paul II, the great pro-life champion, taught (Evangelium Vitae, 1995, para.97) it is an illusion to think that we can build a true culture of human life if we do not offer adolescents and young adults an authentic education in sexuality, and in love, and the whole of life according to their true meaning and in their close interconnection.

Comments on this blog? Email them to johnsmeaton@spuc.org.uk
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy