As Alison Davis of No Less Human points out in her new paper "The case of Tony Bland", the practice of consigning vulnerable patients to a death pathway stems from the 1992 court ruling against Tony Bland, which resulted in him being dehydrated to death. The government's 2005 Mental Capacity Act extended the possible scope of this practice. The inherent right to life of all patients, whether they are terminally ill or not, must be defended in the face of a war against the weak. As Alison argues:
"What was started in Bland may well end in the direct killing of any sick, disabled or elderly person, on the grounds that such lives have no value. We all have reason to be very afraid."This is particularly true considering the government's predictable yet disturbing response to concerns about the Liverpool Care Pathway, which is simply to praise the Pathway and its own record to the skies. A government concerned about possible killings of patients would consult the concerned experts and launch an investigation.
May I urge readers to check whether the Pathway is being rolled out in hospitals, hospices or care homes where you live? If so, please write to the management there and draw their attention courteously to the concerns expressed about the Pathway expressed in the Telegraph letter.
Comments on this blog? Email them to firstname.lastname@example.org
Sign up for alerts to new blog-posts and/or for SPUC's other email services
Follow SPUC on Twitter
Join SPUC's Facebook group
Please support SPUC. Please donate, join, and/or leave a legacy